Avoiding Ultra-Processed Foods – Useful Advice or Useless Label?
Our latest blog explores the debate around the term “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs) and whether advising people to avoid them is helpful or overly simplistic.
The Case Against the Term “Ultra-Processed Foods”
-
- Oversimplification: The term lumps together a wide variety of foods, some of which may have benefits (e.g., fortified foods).
- Potential Misuse: Demonizing UPFs may lead people to unnecessarily avoid foods that could complement a healthy diet.
- Nuance Matters: Just as not all fats are bad, not all UPFs are entirely harmful, making broad labels unhelpful for nuanced dietary choices.
The Case for Avoiding UPFs
- Nutritional Deficiency: UPFs often lack essential nutrients like protein, fiber, and healthy fats, while being rich in sugar, refined carbs, and processed fats.
- Additives & Overeating: Ingredients like flavour enhancers and additives can disrupt hunger signals, leading to overeating and even addiction.
- Health Risks: A growing body of evidence links UPFs to obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, mental health issues, and shorter lifespans.
- Practical Simplicity: Public health advice should be simple. Encouraging avoidance of UPFs often leads to healthier food choices overall.
Read our latest blog
Subscribe
Login
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Oldest